Are You Honourable or Horrible? The Dichotomy in the Lives of Nigerian Politicians and Gullible Supporters

Are You Honourable or Horrible? The Dichotomy in the Lives of Nigerian Politicians and Gullible Supporters

In the complex landscape of Nigerian politics, a stark dichotomy often emerges between the self-proclaimed honorability of politicians and the sometimes harsh reality perceived by their constituents. The term "Honourable" is commonly used as a title for elected officials, a designation that implies respect, integrity, and a commitment to public service. However, a closer look at the actions of some politicians, juxtaposed with the expectations of their gullible supporters, reveals a disheartening truth.

Nigerian politicians, particularly those in the limelight, frequently adorn themselves with titles like "Honourable" while navigating a landscape marred by corruption, scandals, and a perceived lack of accountability. The question then arises: Are they genuinely honourable or merely using the title as a veneer to mask their questionable conduct?

One of the prevalent issues is the alleged embezzlement of public funds. While politicians often promise to champion the cause of their constituents, there are instances where the funds meant for development projects mysteriously disappear, leaving communities in perpetual stagnation. Gullible supporters, blinded by loyalty or desperate for change, may overlook these discrepancies, inadvertently contributing to a cycle of unaccountability.

Another facet of this dichotomy is the prevalence of vote-buying during elections. Despite democratic ideals, reports of politicians enticing voters with monetary incentives persist. Gullible supporters, facing economic hardships, might succumb to these inducements, inadvertently compromising the democratic process and perpetuating a system where leaders prioritize personal gain over public welfare.

Furthermore, the Nigerian political landscape is rife with power struggles and party defections, often driven by personal interests rather than ideological convictions. Politicians, quick to switch allegiances, might find themselves at odds with the principles they claimed to uphold during election campaigns. This inconsistency leaves gullible supporters disillusioned, questioning the authenticity of their chosen representatives.

The media plays a pivotal role in shaping public perception, and politicians adeptly use it to their advantage. Image-building campaigns and carefully curated narratives can sway public opinion, making it challenging for gullible supporters to discern between the genuine and the contrived. The allure of titles like "Honourable" serves as a shield, deflecting criticism and casting an illusion of respectability.

To bridge this gap between perception and reality, there is a need for increased civic education and awareness. Gullible supporters must be empowered to critically evaluate the actions of their elected officials, holding them accountable for their promises and deeds. Additionally, fostering a culture of transparency, where politicians are held to rigorous standards of integrity, can help rebuild trust in the political system.

In conclusion, the dichotomy between honourability and horribleness in Nigerian politics is a complex issue that requires multifaceted solutions. While some politicians genuinely strive to serve their constituents with honour, others tarnish the title "Honourable" through actions that betray the public trust. Empowering gullible supporters to scrutinize and demand accountability is crucial for fostering a political landscape that truly reflects the principles of democracy and public service.

Exclusively written by

Engr Charles David LAPMOEN

Duke of Jos